Flexible Budget A functional budget is a budget prepared using the ACTUAL level that production rather of the budgeted activity. The difference in between actual prices incurred and the flexible budget amount because that that same level of to work is referred to as a spending plan variance. Budget variances deserve to indicate a department’s or company’s level of efficiency, due to the fact that they emerge from a comparison of what was through what should have actually been. The performance report shows the budget variance for each heat item.

You are watching: A flexible budget performance report compares the differences between:

A flexible budget allows volume differences to be gotten rid of from the evaluation since we space using the exact same actual level of task for both budget and also actual. How have the right to we perform this? us will need to recognize the budgeted variable price per unit because that each change cost. Budgeted fixed costs would continue to be the same due to the fact that they do not adjust based top top volume.

To illustrate the computation of budget plan variances, assume the Leed’s administration prepared one overhead budget based on an expected volume that 100% capacity, or 25,000 units. At this level that production, the budgeted lot for provides is a variable price at \$0.08 every unit because that a full of \$2,000 (25,000 units x \$0.08). Through the end of the period, Leed has actually used \$1,900 of supplies. Our very first impression is that a favorable variance of \$100 exist (\$1,900 actual lot is less than the \$2,000 spending plan amount).

However, if Leed’s actual production for the duration was just 22,500 systems (90% that capacity), the company would have an unfavorable variance of \$100. Why? because at 90% volume of 22,500 units, the functional operating budget for offers would it is in \$1,800 (22,500 devices x \$0.08). The \$1900 really supplies used is \$100 more than the flexible spending plan amount the \$1,800. Consequently, it shows up that Leed provided supplies inefficiently.

To give another example making use of the data in exhibit 6, Leed’s monitoring may have budgeted maintain at USD 5,600 for a given duration assuming the agency planned to develop 20,000 units (80 every cent of operation capacity). However, Leed’s really maintenance costs may have been USD 6,200 for the period. This an outcome does no necessarily typical that Leed had an adverse variance that USD 600. The variance counts on actual production volume.

Assume when again that Leed actually developed 22,500 units throughout the period. The agency had budgeted maintenance expenses at USD 6,300 for that level the production. Therefore, there would actually be a favorable variance the USD 100 (USD 6,300 – USD 6,200).

Flexible budgets often present budgeted quantities for every 10 per cent readjust in the level that operations, such as at the 70 per cent, 80 per cent, 90 every cent, and 100 every cent level of capacity. However, really production may fall between the levels presented in the versatile budget. If so, the agency can find the budgeted quantities at that level of operations utilizing the following formula:

Budgeted lot = Budgeted fixed portion of expenses +

Flexible operation budget and also budget variances illustrated As stated earlier, a functional operating budget provides detailed information about budgeted expenses at miscellaneous levels of activity. The main advantage of using a functional operating budget together with a plan operating budget plan is that management deserve to appraise performance on two levels. First, management deserve to compare the actual outcomes with the planned operating budget, which permits management to analysis the deviation of actual output from supposed output. Second, offered the really level of operations, management have the right to compare actual expenses at actual volume through budgeted costs at yes, really volume. The usage of functional operating budgets offers a precious basis for comparison when actual manufacturing or sales volume differs from expectations.

Using the data from exhibition 3, exhibition 7 and Exhibit 8, existing Leed’s in-depth planned operating budget and also flexible operating budget for the quarter finished 2010 march 31. The plan operating budget plan was based on a sales forecast of 20,000 units and a production forecast the 25,000 units. Exhibit 7 and Exhibit 8 present actual sales of 19,000 units and also actual production of 25,000 units. (As is generally the case, the budgeted and also actual quantities are no equal.) The actual marketing price to be USD 20 per unit, the very same price the management had actually forecasted.

 Leed Company Comparison that planned operating budget and also actual results For quarter finished 2010 in march 31 Planned budget Actual Sales (budgeted 20,000 units, yes, really 19,000 units) \$400,000 \$380,000 Cost of products sold: beginning finished products inventory \$130,000 \$130,000 expense of items manufactured (25,000 units): direct materials \$ 50,000 \$ 62,500 direct labor 150,000 143,750 Variable production overhead 25,000 31,250 Fixed production overhead 75,000 75,000 cost of products manufactured \$300,000 \$312,500 price of goods accessible for sale \$430,000 \$442,500 finishing finished goods inventory 180,000 200,000 price of products sold \$250,000 \$242,500 Gross margin \$150,000 \$137,500 Selling and also administrative expenses: Variable \$ 40,000 \$ 28,500 Fixed 100,000 95,000 full selling and also administrative expenses \$ 140,000 \$123,500 Income prior to income taxes \$ 10,000 \$ 14,000 Deduct: estimated income count (40%) 4,000 5,600 Net income \$ 6,000 \$ 8,400

Exhibit 7: Leed Company: compare of planned operating budget and actual results

In exhibition 7 we compare the actual results with the planned operating budget. To compare of actual outcomes with the to plan operating budget yields some helpful information since it reflects where actual power deviated indigenous planned performance. Because that example, sales to be 1,000 units lower than expected, sales revenue to be USD 20,000 much less than expected, pistol margin was USD 12,500 less than expected, and also net income was USD 2,400 much more than expected.

The compare of actual results with the to plan operating budget plan does not carry out a basis for analyzing whether or not management performed efficiently at the yes, really level that operations. Because that example, in exhibit 7, the expense of products sold was USD 7,500 much less than expected. The an interpretation of this difference is no clear, however, since the actual expense of goods sold relates to the 19,000 devices actually sold, while the planned cost of products sold relates come the 20,000 devices expected.

A company makes a valid analysis of price controls by comparing actual outcomes with a versatile operating budget based on the levels of sales and also production that in reality occurred. Exhibition 8 reflects the compare of Leed’s functional operating budget plan with the really results. Note that the flexible budget plan in exhibit 8 is made up of several pieces. The functional budget amounts for sales revenue and also selling and also administrative expenses come from a versatile sales budget plan (not shown) for 19,000 units of sales.

 Leed Company Comparison of versatile operating budget and also actual results For quarter finished 2010 march 31 Flexible budget Actual Budget variance end (under) Sales (19,000 units) \$ 380,000 \$ 380,000 \$ -0- Cost of items sold: Beginning finished products inventory \$ 130,000 \$ 130,000 \$ -0- Cost of products manufactured (25,000 units): straight materials \$ 50,000 \$ 62,500 \$ (12,500) direct labor 150,000 143,750 (6,250) Variable production overhead 25,000 31,250 6,250 Fixed manufacturing overhead 75,000 75,000 -0- expense of goods manufactured) \$300,000 \$312,500 \$ 12,500 expense of goods accessible for sale \$430,000 \$442,500 \$ 12,500 ending finished items inventory 192,000 200,000 8,000 expense of products sold (19,000 units) \$238,000 \$242,500 \$ 4,500 Gross margin \$ 142,000 \$ 137,500 \$ (4,500) Selling and administrative expenses: Variable \$ 38,000 \$ 28,500 \$ (9,500) Fixed 100,000 95,000 (5,000) complete selling and administrative expenses \$138,000 \$123,500 \$ (14,500) Income before income taxes \$ 4,000 \$ 14,000 \$ 10,000 Deduct: estimated taxes (40%) 1,600 5,600 4,000 Net income \$ 2,400 \$ 8,400 \$ 6,000

Exhibit 8: Leed Company: compare of functional operating budget and actual results

In to compare such together these, if the number of units created is equal to the number sold, many companies carry out not display their beginning and also ending inventories in their functional operating budgets. Instead, the functional operating budget plan may display the variety of units actually sold multiplied through the budgeted unit price of direct materials, direct labor, and also manufacturing overhead. This budget also shows actual costs for direct materials, straight labor, and manufacturing overhead for the number of units sold.

See more: What Triggers The Movement Of Water Out Of The Descending Limb?

The compare of the actual outcomes with the functional operating budget (Exhibit 8) reveals some inefficiencies because that items in the expense of goods manufactured section. For instance, direct materials and variable overhead costs were considerably higher than expected. Straight labor costs, top top the various other hand, were somewhat lower than expected. Both variable and also fixed selling and also administrative costs were lower than expected. Net income was USD 6,000 more than supposed at a sales level that 19,000 units.