As girlfriend should know from her high college algebra course, the square source y that a number x is such the y2 = x. By multiply the worth y by itself, we gain the worth x. Because that instance, 16.9706 the square root of 288 because 16.97062 = 16.9706×16.9706 = 288.

You are watching: Square root of 288 in radical form

Square root of 288 = **16.9706**

## Is 288 a Perfect Square Root?

No. The square source of 288 is no an integer, for this reason √288 isn"t a perfect square.

Previous perfect square source is: 256

Next perfect square source is: 289

## How perform You leveling the Square root of 288 in Radical Form?

The main allude of simplification (to the easiest radical form of 288) is as follows: acquiring the number 288 inside the radical sign √ together low as possible.

288= 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 × 3= 122

Therefore, the price is **12**2.

## Is the Square root of 288 reasonable or Irrational?

Since 288 isn"t a perfect square (it"s square root will have an infinite variety of decimals), **it is one irrational number**.

## The Babylonian (or Heron’s) method (Step-By-Step)

StepSequencing1 | In step 1, we need to make our first guess about the value of the square source of 288. To carry out this, division the number 288 by 2. As a an outcome of splitting 288/2, we acquire |

2 | Next, we must divide 288 through the result of the previous step (144).288/144 = Calculate the arithmetic median of this value (2) and also the an outcome of action 1 (144).(144 + 2)/2 = Calculate the error by subtracting the previous worth from the brand-new guess.|73 - 144| = 7171 > 0.001 Repeat this action again as the margin that error is higher than than 0.001 |

3 | Next, we need to divide 288 by the an outcome of the previous action (73).288/73 = Calculate the arithmetic average of this worth (3.9452) and the result of step 2 (73).(73 + 3.9452)/2 = Calculate the error by individually the previous value from the new guess.|38.4726 - 73| = 34.527434.5274 > 0.001 Repeat this step again as the margin the error is better than 보다 0.001 |

4 | Next, we have to divide 288 through the result of the previous action (38.4726).288/38.4726 = Calculate the arithmetic typical of this value (7.4858) and the an outcome of step 3 (38.4726).(38.4726 + 7.4858)/2 = Calculate the error by individually the previous value from the new guess.|22.9792 - 38.4726| = 15.493415.4934 > 0.001 Repeat this action again together the margin the error is greater than 보다 0.001 |

5 | Next, we should divide 288 through the result of the previous action (22.9792).288/22.9792 = Calculate the arithmetic mean of this value (12.5331) and also the result of step 4 (22.9792).(22.9792 + 12.5331)/2 = Calculate the error by individually the previous value from the brand-new guess.|17.7562 - 22.9792| = 5.2235.223 > 0.001 Repeat this step again together the margin that error is better than than 0.001 |

6 | Next, we should divide 288 by the an outcome of the previous action (17.7562).288/17.7562 = Calculate the arithmetic mean of this value (16.2197) and also the an outcome of action 5 (17.7562).(17.7562 + 16.2197)/2 = Calculate the error by individually the previous value from the brand-new guess.|16.988 - 17.7562| = 0.76820.7682 > 0.001 Repeat this step again as the margin the error is better than than 0.001 |

7 | Next, we need to divide 288 by the result of the previous step (16.988).288/16.988 = Calculate the arithmetic average of this worth (16.9531) and the result of action 6 (16.988).(16.988 + 16.9531)/2 = Calculate the error by subtracting the previous worth from the brand-new guess.|16.9706 - 16.988| = 0.01740.0174 > 0.001 Repeat this step again together the margin the error is greater than 보다 0.001 |

8 | Next, we should divide 288 through the an outcome of the previous action (16.9706).288/16.9706 = Calculate the arithmetic mean of this worth (16.9705) and the an outcome of step 7 (16.9706).(16.9706 + 16.9705)/2 = Calculate the error by individually the previous value from the brand-new guess.|16.9706 - 16.9706| = 00 |

Result | ✅ We found the result: 16.9706 In this case, the took united state eight procedures to uncover the result. |