elevating a numbers to the strength which is a positive totality number

The concept of logarithms developed from that of powers of numbers. If the properties of strength are acquainted to you, friend may conveniently skim through the product below. If not--well, below are the details. Powers of a number are derived by multiplying it through itself. For instance2.2 deserve to be composed 22 "Two squared" or "2 to the 2nd power"2.2.2 = 23 ."Two cubed" or "2 come the 3rd power"" = 24 "Two come the 4th power" or simply "2 to the 4th"". = 25 "Two to the 5th power" or just "2 to the 5th"" = 26 "Two come the 6th power" or simply "2 to the 6th"" and so on... The number in the superscript is known as one "exponent." The distinct names for "squared" and also "cubed" come due to the fact that a square of next 2 has actually area 22 and also a cube of side 2 has actually volume 23. Similarly, a square of next 16.3 has area (16.3)2 and also a cube of side 9.25 has volume (9.25)3. Keep in mind the usage of parentheses--they space not absolutely needed, but they aid make clear what is elevated to the 2nd or 3rd power.Quick Quiz:The Greek Pythagoras confirmed (about 500 BC) the if (a,b,c) room lengths the the sides of a right-angled triangle, v c the longest, climate a2 + b2 = c2In a right angles triangle, a = 12, b = 5. Deserve to you guess c? i m sorry is larger--23 or 32? 27 or 53?A slight modification of an old riddle goes: together I was going come St. IvesI met a man with seven wivesEach wife had seven sacksEach sack had actually seven catsEach cat had actually seven kitsKits, cats, man, wives--how countless were comes from St. Ives?It all involves powers that 7:Man -- 70 = 1Wives-- 71 = 7Sacks-- 72 = 49 (but they room not part of the count)Cats-- 73 = 343Kits-- 74 = 2401 complete count: 1 + 7 + 343 + 2401 = 2752As noted, this is slightly modified indigenous the original riddle, i beg your pardon asks "how numerous were going come St. Ives?" The answer is that course simply one, the human telling the riddle. Countless listeners however are distracted by the countless details given, miss the difference and perform the over calculation. Their answer is climate wrong! The renowned Indian mathematician Ramanujan was sick in a hospital (tuberculosis, probably) as soon as he was visited by his girlfriend the mathematician G.H Hardy, that had earlier invited him to England. Hardy later on told:I remember once going to view him once he to be ill at Putney. I had actually ridden in taxi cab number 1729 and also remarked the the number appeared to me fairly a dull one, and that i hoped it was not negative omen. "No," he replied, "it is a an extremely interesting number; that is the the smallest number expressible together the sum of 2 cubes in two different ways."Cubes are 3rd powers. What are they, in this example? try guessing, choices are limited.

You are watching: What is 2 to the 5th power

Multiplying powers

Note the (23).(22) = 25since the first term contributes three factors of 2 and also the second term contributes two--together, 5 multiplications by 2. The same will organize if "2" is changed by any kind of number. So, if the number is represented by "x" we get (x3).(x2) = x5and in basic (since over there is naught special around 2 and also 3 which will not organize for other whole numbers) (xa).(xb) = x(a+b)where a and b are any kind of whole numbers. The many widely supplied powers by totality numbers, for customers of the decimal system, space of food those that 10101 = 10 ("ten")102 = 100 ("hundred")103 = 1000 ("thousand")104 = 10,000 ("ten thousand"))105 = 100,000 ("a hundreds thousand")106 = 1,000,000 ("a million") note that right here the "power index" also gives the number of zeros. For bigger numbers, it used to be that in the us 109 = 1,000,000,000 was dubbed "a billion" if in Europe that was dubbed a "milliard" and one had actually to advancement to 1012 to reach a "billion." these days the united state convention is gaining ground, however the world remains divided between nations where the comma denotes what we speak to "the decimal point", while the suggest divides big numbers, e.g. 109 = (in the united state commas would be used). It also should be detailed that some societies have assigned names to some various other powers that 10--e.g. The Greeks provided "myriad" for 10,000 when the Hebrew bible named that "r"vavah," and in India "Lakh" still method 100,000, if "crore" is 10,000,000. A 9-year old in 1920 coined the name "Googol" because that 10100, but the word found little use past inspiring the surname of a find engine top top the world-wide web.

Dividing one strength by another

In a way very comparable to the above, we deserve to write (25) / (22) = 23since splitting a power of 2 through some smaller power method canceling from the numerator a number of factors equal to those in the denominator. Writing it out in detail( / (2.2) = 2.2.2 here too the number elevated to higher power need not be 2--again, denote it by x--and the powers require not it is in 5 and 2, yet can be any type of two whole numbers, speak a and also b: (xa) / (xb) = x(a–b) Here but a new twist is added, due to the fact that subtraction can additionally yield zero, or even an adverse numbers. Prior to exploring that direction, the helps overview a basic course to follow.

Expanding the meaning of "Number"

back at the dim starts of humanity, "numbers" simply meant positive totality numbers ("integers"): one apple, two apples, three apples... An easy fractions were likewise found useful--1/2, 1/3 and also so on.Then zero to be added, initially from India.Then an unfavorable numbers to be given full status--rather than watch subtraction as a different operation, it was re-interpreted as enhancement of a negative number. Similarly, come every integer x there synchronized an "inverse" number (1/x) (many calculators have a 1/x button too). In old Egypt, 5000 years ago, these to be the just fractions recognized, and also they are because of this still sometimes called "Egyptian fractions." as soon as an Egyptian of the time want to refer 3/4, it was presented as (1/2 + 1/4). Sometimes long expressions were needed, e.g 99/100 = 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/5 + 1/25but it constantly worked. The ancient Greeks walk further and also defined as "rational number" (or "logical" numbers--"rational" originates from Latin) any kind of multiple of such an inverse, for instance 4/13, 22/7 or 355/113. Rational numbers room dense: no matter how close two of them space to every other, one could always place another rational number in between them--for instance, fifty percent their amount is one selection out of many. Decimal fountain which protect against at some size are rational number too, though decimal fractions having infinite length but with a repeating pattern (0.33333..., 0.575757... Etc.) can always be expressed as rational fractions. Greek philosophers in the early on days of mathematics were as such surprised to find that regardless of that density, part extra numbers can still "hide" in between rational ones, and could not be represented by any type of rational number. Because that instance, √2 is of this class, the number whose square equals 2. Many square roots and solutions that equations are additionally of this kind, together is π, the ratio between the circumference of a circle and its diameter (denoted through the Greek letter "pi"). Pi has a fair approximation in 22/7 and a much much better one in 355/113, yet its precise value can never be stood for by any type of fraction. Mathematicians check out all the preceding species of number as a solitary class that "real numbers". Logarithms of hopeful numbers are genuine numbers, too. Once one writes2 = 100.3010299.. so that 0.3010299.. = log in 2(the dots represent an rarely often, rarely continuation) one see it together 10 elevated to a power which is some actual number. Earlier, powers to be integers, denoting the variety of times some number was multiplied by itself. To make the over expression meaningful, that is thus necessary come generalize the principle of elevating a number to some power come where any real number have the right to be the strength index.

Logarithms of strength of 10

These room all entirety numbers:101 = 10 so log 10 = 1102 = 100 so log in 100 = 2 103 = 1000 so log 1000 = 3 104 = 10,000 for this reason log10,000 = 4 105 = 100,000 so log 100,000 = 5 106 = 1,000,000 so log 1,000,000 = 6 this logarithms also satisfy the rules us found(xa).(xb) = x(a+b)So if x=10 U = (10a) V = (10b) W = (10(a+b)) = U.Vthen because a = log U b = logV (a+b) = log Wwe have actually logV + log in U = log in (U.V) This relationship holds at any time U and V space powers that 10: The logarithm the the product is the amount of the logarithms the the multiply numbers. together demonstrated in the overview in the preceding section. Together the ide of logarithm is broadened, that property always remains. The is what initially made logarithms useful: converting multiplication into addition. Rather of having actually to main point U and V, we only need add their logarithms and also then look because that the number who logarithm amounts to that sum: that will certainly be the product (U.V).Similarly, (xa) / (xb) = x(a–b)so if x=10, U = (10a) V = (10b) W = (10(a–b)) = U/Vthen in the division we havelogU – log in V = log in (U/V) or "the logarithm the the quotient is the difference between the logarithms of the separated numbers," e.g. 107 / 104 = 103 which agrees v 7 – 4 = 3.Division, though, opens up a new territory: by the same rule, for circumstances 1040 / 1043 = 10–3 = 0.001And 104 / 104 = 100 = 1 due to the fact that a number is being divided by itself must equal 1.Indeed, this is continual with the rule, the adding or individually 1 come the logarithm move its number one decimal come the ideal of left. Earlier106 = 1,000,000 so log 1,000,000 = 6 105 = 100,000 so log in 100,000 = 5 104 = 10,000 so log10,000 = 4 103 = 1000 so log in 1000 = 3 102 = 100 so log in 100 = 2 101 = 10 so log 10 = 1and currently this have the right to be extended, separating by 10 at each step100 = 1 so log 1 = 010–1 = 0.1 so log in 0.1 = –1 10–2 = 0.01 so log in 0.01 = –2 10–3 = 0.001 so log 0.001 = –3 10– 4 = 0.000 1 so log in 0.000 1 = –4 10–5 = 0.000 01 so log 0.000 01 = –5 10–6 = 0.000 001 so log 0.000 001 = –6 The above demonstrates one more property the logarithms:Log (VQ) = Q log in VFor the special case V = 10, logV = 1

Scientific Notation

The quantities with which scientists work-related are occasionally very tiny or really large. It is then practically (for calculation, and additionally for applying logarithms) to different the number into two parts--a number native 1 come 10, giving its structure, and a power of 10, offering the magnitude. Electrical charge, for instance, is measured in coulombs: about one coulomb operation each second through a 100-watt lightbulb. That current is lugged by a huge number of tiny negative particles, uncovered in any atom and known as electrons. Each electron carries a charge of q = 1.60219 10–19 coulomb If this were to be created as a decimal fraction, the expression would certainly take about fifty percent a line, with 18 zeros complying with the decimal suggest in front of the significant digits--and a quick look at it would certainly not offer much information, one still would certainly have had to count the zeros. The fixed of the electron is similarly smallm = 9.1095 10–29 kgScientific notation simplifies composing such numbers. Yet another example is the speed of light, as decimal number (accuracy come 6 figures) 299,792,000, in clinical notation c = 2.99792 108 meter/second clinical notation additionally makes multiplication and division easier and also less error prone. One multiplies or divides separately the numerical factors, each in between 1 and also 10, and also usually sees in ~ a glance if the result is the the right selection of magnitude. Separately, one adds with each other all power exponents of multiply factors, and also subtracts those of divided ones, to gain the proper power that 10 which then appears in clinical notation. That course, in any kind of calculation, one have to use consistent units--it would not execute to mix meters and also inches, or pounds and grams (such inconsistent use apparently led to an error which resulted in a room probe come Mars to miss out on the planet and also get lost). The most usual consistent device in physics and an innovation is the MKS system, measuring street in meters, mass in kilograms and time in seconds. All other units are determined by the an option of these three standards, and as lengthy as one continues to be in the MKS system, results conform to devices of that device too (e.g. If energy is gift calculated, it always comes out in joules).

An example

electron of the polar aurora ("northern lights") move at around 1/5 the velocity that light, in a magnetic ar B which near the ground is about 5 10–5 Tesla (the Tesla is the MKS unit of magnetic field: at the pole the an iron magnet girlfriend get about 1 Tesla). The magnetic field reasons an electron come spiral approximately the direction of the magnetic force ("magnetic field line") v a radius that r = mv/(qB)where v is the part of the velocity perpendicular to the direction the B. If the ingredient perpendicular to B is fifty percent the complete velocity (i.e c/10), what is r?We have actually m = 9.1095 10–29 Kg v = 2.99791 107 m/sec (= 0.1 c) q = 1.60219 10–19 coulomb B = 5 10–5 TeslaCollecting every numerical factors, and rounding turn off to 3 decimals(9.11).(3.00)/<(1.6).(5)> = 3.42Collecting all exponents(– 29+7) – (–19 – 5) = (– 22) – (– 24) = +2The radius is because of this 3.42 102 meter or 342 meters. The is the order of the radius of a an extremely thin auroral ray, checked out from the ground. Considering that the ground from which aurora is usually perceived is 100 kilometers listed below the aurora, together a beam must appear as very thin indeed.Next section: (M-15) elevating one strength to Another and a graphic use of logarithms.Back come the grasp List Timeline Glossary mathematics indexAuthor and also Curator: Dr.

See more: Emergency Care And Transportation Of The Sick And Injured, : 9781284080179

David P. SternMail to Dr.Stern: stargaze("at" symbol)4476mountvernon.com .Updated 9 November 2007, edited 28 October 2016