### elevating a numbers to the strength which is a positive totality number

The concept of logarithms developed from that of powers of numbers. If the properties of strength are acquainted to you, friend may conveniently skim through the product below. If not--well, below are the details. Powers of a number are derived by multiplying it through itself. For instance2.2 deserve to be composed 22 "Two squared" or "2 to the 2nd power"2.2.2 = 23 ."Two cubed" or "2 come the 3rd power""2.2.2.2 = 24 "Two come the 4th power" or simply "2 to the 4th"".2.2.2.2.2 = 25 "Two to the 5th power" or just "2 to the 5th""2.2.2.2.2.2 = 26 "Two come the 6th power" or simply "2 to the 6th"" and so on... The number in the superscript is known as one "exponent." The distinct names for "squared" and also "cubed" come due to the fact that a square of next 2 has actually area 22 and also a cube of side 2 has actually volume 23. Similarly, a square of next 16.3 has area (16.3)2 and also a cube of side 9.25 has volume (9.25)3. Keep in mind the usage of parentheses--they space not absolutely needed, but they aid make clear what is elevated to the 2nd or 3rd power.Quick Quiz:The Greek Pythagoras confirmed (about 500 BC) the if (a,b,c) room lengths the the sides of a right-angled triangle, v c the longest, climate a2 + b2 = c2In a right angles triangle, a = 12, b = 5. Deserve to you guess c? i m sorry is larger--23 or 32? 27 or 53?A slight modification of an old riddle goes: together I was going come St. IvesI met a man with seven wivesEach wife had seven sacksEach sack had actually seven catsEach cat had actually seven kitsKits, cats, man, wives--how countless were comes from St. Ives?It all involves powers that 7:Man -- 70 = 1Wives-- 71 = 7Sacks-- 72 = 49 (but they room not part of the count)Cats-- 73 = 343Kits-- 74 = 2401 complete count: 1 + 7 + 343 + 2401 = 2752As noted, this is slightly modified indigenous the original riddle, i beg your pardon asks "how numerous were going come St. Ives?" The answer is that course simply one, the human telling the riddle. Countless listeners however are distracted by the countless details given, miss the difference and perform the over calculation. Their answer is climate wrong! The renowned Indian mathematician Ramanujan was sick in a hospital (tuberculosis, probably) as soon as he was visited by his girlfriend the mathematician G.H Hardy, that had earlier invited him to England. Hardy later on told:I remember once going to view him once he to be ill at Putney. I had actually ridden in taxi cab number 1729 and also remarked the the number appeared to me fairly a dull one, and that i hoped it was not negative omen. "No," he replied, "it is a an extremely interesting number; that is the the smallest number expressible together the sum of 2 cubes in two different ways."Cubes are 3rd powers. What are they, in this example? try guessing, choices are limited.

You are watching: What is 2 to the 5th power

### Multiplying powers

Note the (23).(22) = 25since the first term contributes three factors of 2 and also the second term contributes two--together, 5 multiplications by 2. The same will organize if "2" is changed by any kind of number. So, if the number is represented by "x" we get (x3).(x2) = x5and in basic (since over there is naught special around 2 and also 3 which will not organize for other whole numbers) (xa).(xb) = x(a+b)where a and b are any kind of whole numbers. The many widely supplied powers by totality numbers, for customers of the decimal system, space of food those that 10101 = 10 ("ten")102 = 100 ("hundred")103 = 1000 ("thousand")104 = 10,000 ("ten thousand"))105 = 100,000 ("a hundreds thousand")106 = 1,000,000 ("a million") note that right here the "power index" also gives the number of zeros. For bigger numbers, it used to be that in the us 109 = 1,000,000,000 was dubbed "a billion" if in Europe that was dubbed a "milliard" and one had actually to advancement to 1012 to reach a "billion." these days the united state convention is gaining ground, however the world remains divided between nations where the comma denotes what we speak to "the decimal point", while the suggest divides big numbers, e.g. 109 = 1.000.000.000 (in the united state commas would be used). It also should be detailed that some societies have assigned names to some various other powers that 10--e.g. The Greeks provided "myriad" for 10,000 when the Hebrew bible named that "r"vavah," and in India "Lakh" still method 100,000, if "crore" is 10,000,000. A 9-year old in 1920 coined the name "Googol" because that 10100, but the word found little use past inspiring the surname of a find engine top top the world-wide web.

### Dividing one strength by another

In a way very comparable to the above, we deserve to write (25) / (22) = 23since splitting a power of 2 through some smaller power method canceling from the numerator a number of factors equal to those in the denominator. Writing it out in detail(2.2.2.2.2) / (2.2) = 2.2.2 here too the number elevated to higher power need not be 2--again, denote it by x--and the powers require not it is in 5 and 2, yet can be any type of two whole numbers, speak a and also b: (xa) / (xb) = x(a–b) Here but a new twist is added, due to the fact that subtraction can additionally yield zero, or even an adverse numbers. Prior to exploring that direction, the helps overview a basic course to follow.

### Expanding the meaning of "Number"

back at the dim starts of humanity, "numbers" simply meant positive totality numbers ("integers"): one apple, two apples, three apples... An easy fractions were likewise found useful--1/2, 1/3 and also so on.Then zero to be added, initially from India.Then an unfavorable numbers to be given full status--rather than watch subtraction as a different operation, it was re-interpreted as enhancement of a negative number. Similarly, come every integer x there synchronized an "inverse" number (1/x) (many calculators have a 1/x button too). In old Egypt, 5000 years ago, these to be the just fractions recognized, and also they are because of this still sometimes called "Egyptian fractions." as soon as an Egyptian of the time want to refer 3/4, it was presented as (1/2 + 1/4). Sometimes long expressions were needed, e.g 99/100 = 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/5 + 1/25but it constantly worked. The ancient Greeks walk further and also defined as "rational number" (or "logical" numbers--"rational" originates from Latin) any kind of multiple of such an inverse, for instance 4/13, 22/7 or 355/113. Rational numbers room dense: no matter how close two of them space to every other, one could always place another rational number in between them--for instance, fifty percent their amount is one selection out of many. Decimal fountain which protect against at some size are rational number too, though decimal fractions having infinite length but with a repeating pattern (0.33333..., 0.575757... Etc.) can always be expressed as rational fractions. Greek philosophers in the early on days of mathematics were as such surprised to find that regardless of that density, part extra numbers can still "hide" in between rational ones, and could not be represented by any type of rational number. Because that instance, √2 is of this class, the number whose square equals 2. Many square roots and solutions that equations are additionally of this kind, together is π, the ratio between the circumference of a circle and its diameter (denoted through the Greek letter "pi"). Pi has a fair approximation in 22/7 and a much much better one in 355/113, yet its precise value can never be stood for by any type of fraction. Mathematicians check out all the preceding species of number as a solitary class that "real numbers". Logarithms of hopeful numbers are genuine numbers, too. Once one writes2 = 100.3010299.. so that 0.3010299.. = log in 2(the dots represent an rarely often, rarely continuation) one see it together 10 elevated to a power which is some actual number. Earlier, powers to be integers, denoting the variety of times some number was multiplied by itself. To make the over expression meaningful, that is thus necessary come generalize the principle of elevating a number to some power come where any real number have the right to be the strength index.